Gold Liquidation

The decline in gold over the last two trading days has been stunning.  But what is perhaps more significant about this recent move is its potential implications for broader investment markets including stocks and high yield bonds.

So what is the reason that has gold been declining so sharply since Friday morning?  Let’s first explain what are not the reasons, as the financial media has the tendency to want to assign fundamental reasons to why things are happening in financial markets that are often unfounded if not completely untrue.  It had nothing to do with China, the decline in gold was already well underway at that point and signs of economic slowing in China would actually be bullish for gold.  It also had nothing to do with reports that Cyprus may be forced to sell their gold to help fund their bailout, as China and India combined could easily buy up all of Cyprus’s gold and more in a single trading day.  And if global central banks were to force other countries to sell their gold to support bailouts, we would almost certainly be seeing gold prices soar higher not move lower to serve their own best interests, as central banks have the firepower to do it.  It also had nothing to do with money flowing out of gold and into stocks, as stocks have actually experienced a net outflow of -$700 million since the beginning of February including -$1.9 billion in net outflows in the first week of April alone (which, of course, begs the question as to why the stock market has been going higher if money on net has been flowing out of stocks over the last two months, but this is a topic for another article).  The fact that stocks have also been down over the last two trading days further refutes this notion.  And it also had nothing to do with the supply of gold outweighing demand, as a wealth of data continued to demonstrate sovereign, institutional and retail accumulation of gold over the past year and in particular since the middle of February despite the decline in price along the way.  Lastly, this is not just a story limited to gold, as the entire commodities complex including silver, platinum, palladium, copper and oil have also been in sharp decline since early Friday.

So exactly why is gold in such sharp decline over the last two trading days?  In a word – liquidation.  In order to highlight this point, it is worthwhile to review how the decline has unfolded over the last two trading days.

During the early morning on Friday, gold was behaving as it would on any normal day.  But the clock struck 10:28AM EDT and gold suddenly plunged into a cascading decline, shedding $40 in just over a half hour before steadying for the remainder of the trading day.  Following the weekend, after continuing lower during the overnight hours on Monday, the clock struck 10:25AM EDT that morning and gold once again cascaded lower by another $40 over the next 36 minutes before actually bouncing higher and moving sideways for the remainder of the day.  In short, nearly half of the entire decline in gold occurred over the course of one total hour in the last two trading days, with most of the remaining drop occurring from 4:30 to 6:00AM EDT on early Monday morning.  These details are informative in helping to pinpoint the exact cause of the gold sell off.

Did an extraordinary fundamental event take place at 10:28AM EDT on Friday morning that sparked the massive sell-off over the course of just 30 minutes?  Absolutely not.  And what is so special about half past ten in the morning on the east coast that another massive sell-off occurred at almost the same exact same time the next trading day on Monday?  The timing here is not a coincidence.  And the same can be said about the drop during the overnight hours on Monday.

All indications suggest that the massive decline in gold over the last two trading days has been the result of massive liquidations by major global financial institutions that have been forced to raise cash quickly.  What is the likely cause for this liquidation activity?  The increasing radioactive interest rate volatility associated with Japanese government bonds is the most likely culprit, as institutions have been forced to come up with sizable capital contributions to protect their massive positions against the recent wild swings in the second largest bond market in the world.  This situation in Japan is becoming increasingly worrisome that continues to require close monitoring for additional spillover effects.  More on this point in a moment.

When these types of situations suddenly arise, gold and other commodities are often sold first since they are among the most liquid investable assets in financial markets.  And the impact of these mass liquidations have spillover effects, as any investors that have purchased gold on margin are eventually forced to sell and cover their positions, which only exacerbates the downside move.  This helps explain why the entire commodities complex has also sold off sharply over the last two trading days.

Eventually the decline in gold and other commodities will cease.  While it is likely that much of the major institutional forced selling of gold has now played out, we may see further downside in gold over the next few days as more investors are forced to sell to cover their margin debts.  And once this selling is completed, it is just as likely that we will see an equally stunning bounce, as the precious metals complex already had short interest that was already multiples above the previous historical highs.  For once these massive shorts move to cover by buying back gold, the rush to the upside could be just as extreme.  But once this process is completed, an extended period of choppiness including aftershock declines should be expected, as the gold market still contains a huge number of weak cash longs that will be desperate to exit their positions at higher prices given the opportunity.  For this reason, I will be looking to use any such rallies to strategically reallocate precious metals allocations.

While the liquidation in gold has been notable, perhaps the far more significant issue looking ahead is what it may be indicating for broader investment markets including stocks.  Major global financial institutions do not simply enter into forced liquidations in a cascading market like gold over the last two trading days without good reason.  Such liquidations occur because something is becoming disconnected within the financial system.  And once these disconnects start to occur, they have the potential to spread like wildfire and unravel very quickly.  While commodities like gold are often sold first during these episodes, stocks and high yield bonds are almost always the next in line.  This is what happened in 2008 – commodities including gold began selling off sharply in August 2008 with stocks and high yield bonds following soon after in September 2008.  And this is the first time we have seen such rapid and massive liquidation activity since that time.

The fact that stocks and high yield bonds deteriorated lower throughout the trading day on Monday suggests that the liquidation problems plaguing gold and commodities may already be spreading into these markets.  This is a major risk that will take several days at least to see how it plays out, but the potential downside for both stocks and high yield bonds is considerable.  Not only can these declines become extremely swift once they take hold as demonstrated by gold over the last two trading days, but both stocks and high yield bonds are also in a far more precarious place on a much higher perch than from where the precious metals began their descent.  Unlike the precious metals that have been trading lower since mid January, stocks and high yield bonds are trading at fresh new highs.  In the case of stocks, this rise has occurred despite weakening fundamentals and valuations that remain well above the historical average.  Moreover, unlike gold that had relatively lower margin debt and massive short positions already in place, stocks are currently operating with their highest level of margin debt since July 2008 with relatively little short interest to spark any meaningful covering bounce.  As for high yield bonds, they are currently trading a premium that essentially represents one year’s worth of coupon payments, which is an unprecedentedly rich valuation for the asset class in an environment where economic data is showing increasing signs of weakness.  Thus, the potential downside in either of these categories is considerably more than the commodities complex in a liquidation event.  The fact that stocks dropped by -28% over the course of just eight trading days in early October 2008 highlights how swift and painful these downside events in stocks can be.

Given these risks, the opportunity was used today to lock in gains and close out a number of stock positions, particularly those that have enjoyed a recently strong run and are currently overbought.  This way, if the recent move in gold turns out to be an isolated event, the opportunity will exist to buy back into stocks particularly as first quarter earnings season progresses.  But if the recent liquidation in commodities spills over into stocks, instead of trying to get out of a sharply declining stock market, the powder will already be dry to seek high quality names at discounted prices on pullbacks.  As for high yield, this is a market that was exited early last month on extreme valuation but would warrant renewed interest on any solid correction.

I will be continuing to monitor these events across all markets as they unfold in the coming days and will follow up with updates.

The contents of this post are provided for information purposes only.  There are risks involved with investing including loss of principal.  GWM makes no explicit or implicit guarantee with respect to performance or the outcome of any investment or projections made by GWM.  There is no guarantee that the goals of the strategies implemented will be met.

Q2 Outlook: Straw On The Camel’s Back

The U.S. stock market posted strong results in the first quarter of 2013.  But what is perhaps more notable is that U.S. stocks were essentially alone in this advance.  Many non-U.S. stock markets fell for the quarter including the Euro Zone and Emerging Markets.  The investment grade bond market also edged lower and high yield bonds, which are highly correlated with stocks, were only incrementally higher.  And the precious metals including gold and silver sold off during the quarter.

What was perhaps more notable is that U.S. stocks pushed higher on their own despite considerable fundamental headwinds that would otherwise be expected to favor the bond and precious metals markets at the expense of stocks.  U.S. economic growth readings remain mixed at best and are slowing in many other parts of the world including the Euro Zone, which is already in recession.  And corporate earnings growth has not only declined on a year-over-year basis already over the past two quarters along with a rolling over of profit margins, but forward earnings projections have also been revised lower by -6% over the past year.  Never before have we seen U.S. stocks post such an advance amid declining corporate earnings growth and profit margins at this late stage of an economic cycle.

Of course, the U.S. stock market has been rising since the beginning of 2013 for one key reason.  On January 4, the U.S. Federal Reserve added daily Treasury purchases to its QE3 stimulus program.  And since that time, U.S. stocks as measured by the S&P 500 Index have risen on 64% of trading days, which is a +6 standard deviation event.  In other words, the daily stock market behavior witnessed in the first quarter is supposed to happen only once every 506 million years.  Clearly, the influence of the Fed on the U.S. stock market is strong.  But is it sustainable?

This is the key question as we move into the second quarter.  While U.S. stocks have continued to show resilience in the first few trading days, they are incrementally lower for Q2 to date.  And in each of the last three years in 2010, 2011 and 2012, the stock market opened the year strongly in Q1 only to plunge into a double-digit decline starting in April and extending into the summer.  With stocks already widely disconnected from fundamentals heading into April 2013, the potential for another sharp pullback is more than a reasonable possibility.

But one important fact differentiates the stock market in 2013.  In each the past three years, a major central bank stimulus program was either ending or was drawing to a close in the month of April.  But this is not the case in April 2013, as the Fed has committed to continue QE3 for as long as it deems necessary.  As a result, it is also more than possible that stocks can defy expectations and continue to rise further in the months ahead, even if underlying fundamentals continue to deteriorate.  This is particularly true given that the Bank of Japan recently announced a massive stimulus plan of its own.  More on this in a moment.

Despite the recently good feelings for stocks generated by monetary policy, what may ultimately stunt if not completely derail the recent stock advance are the mounting structural problems that continue to breakout across the globe.  In short, the probability of a destabilizing financial event is rising, and if any such episode induces major global financial instutitions to retrench on risk assets to protect their capital position, the subsequent decline in stocks could be swift and sharp even with the Fed’s endless support.

This leads to the critical question as we enter the second quarter.  What if anything will be final the straw that breaks the camel’s back and shakes financial markets back to reality?  The following are some leading candidates in the months ahead.

Cyprus Spillover:  While the banking crisis in Cyprus has moved from the headlines, its effects are only beginning to be felt.  The final outcome of the Cyprus debacle was that uninsured depositors with over 100,000 euros in Cyprus banks ended up taking significant haircuts to secure the bailout deal.  And while the media cameras showed no evidence of bank runs in Cyprus once these institutions reopened, nobody expected the oligarchs and other major international depositors to get in line along side the average Cypriot citizen to withdraw their money.  Instead, these are individuals, corporations and foundations from around the world that are likely to be meeting in the coming weeks to discuss among other things whether it continues to make sense to maintain sizeable bank deposits in places like Greece, Portugal, Spain and Italy where the risk of taking a major deposit haircut has now risen substantially.  We are already seeing evidence of banking stress emerging in places like Slovenia, Malta, Ireland and Italy, and the more depositors opt to withdraw deposits, the more creeping electronic bank runs have the potential to pick up speed in the months ahead.  At minimum, this situation merits monitoring going forward.

Japanese Stimulus:  Japan is the world’s third largest economy and has been mired in a two decade long depression marked by seemingly unshakable deflationary price spiral.  New political leadership took over late last year with the commitment of finally shaking the Japanese economy back to life by creating inflation with a target 2% rate.  And keeping with this promise, the Bank of Japan announced late last week its monetary stimulus program that vastly exceeded already aggressive expectations including an extraordinary doubling of its asset base in the coming years.  But here is an illustration of one of the many key problems associated with this plan.  The Japanese 10-year government bond yield is currently 0.52%.  Yes, for every $1,000 you lend to the Japanese government, you receive $5.20 each year over the next ten years.  Quite a deal, and these Japanese yields have been exceptionally low for some time.  But if the Bank of Japan achieves its 2% inflation target, it means that everyone that owns Japanese debt will be left with holdings that provide a negative real yield (this of course assumes that they will be able to stop the rise at 2%, which will be a feat in and of itself).  And what are investors going to do with their Japanese bonds if they are suddenly an investment that is generating a real loss?  They will likely sell these bonds, perhaps aggressively.  Given the fact that the total public debt in Japan is 219% the size of the entire Japanese economy as measured by GDP, achieving the desired 2% inflation target if not much more has the potential of inadvertently collapsing the entire Japanese economy.  Thus, how events unfold in Japan currently present a major risk to the global financial system.

These are just a few of the many risks that global financial markets are currently navigating.  And while the fact that U.S. stocks are showing resilience in the face of these challenges is impressive, it is also disconcerting to a degree.  This is due to the fact that the lack of any reflex to negative news developments indicates a stock market that has effectively become disconnected.  And in such a state, just as stocks can rise beyond all comprehension without fundamental support, so to can they fall dramatically and persistently without seemingly any real reason.  As a result, while maintaining an allocation to stocks certainly makes sense in the current environment given the still strong upside momentum, any considerable overweights to the stock market are associated with far more downside risk than upside reward at this point.

Fortunately, capital markets offer a variety of asset classes to realize positive returns regardless of what stocks are doing at any point in time.  And a number of these categories stand to directly benefit if the stock market enters into correction for the fourth year in a row this April.

Leading among these is the precious metals market.  For as much as stocks have been artificially elevated thus far under the Fed’s latest QE3 stimulus program, precious metals including gold and silver have been artificially suppressed.  But knowing that the laws of supply and demand have not been repealed and that prices will eventually find their way to their true equilibrium over time, steady worldwide accumulation trends along with the fact that short interest is now at historically high levels for both metals suggest that both gold and silver have the meaningful potential to slingshot higher at some point in the coming months.

The bond market is also showing renewed life following a period of weakness over the past few months.  Ironically, the Fed QE stimulus programs that are supposed to result in lower interest rates have typically ended up producing higher interest rates, and the experience during QE3 has been no exception in this regard.  But this effect typically wears off after the first two and a half months following the start of a Treasury purchase program, as institutions retrench following the initial risk asset buying spree.  This timing has also held true under QE3, as the bond market rally kick started in mid March roughly two and half months after the Fed began purchasing Treasuries in early January.  And as long as history continues to provide a reasonable guide, the bond market generally and long-term bonds in particular have shown the propensity to advance strongly higher once the stock market enters into correction.

It promises to be an interesting few months ahead in the second quarter.  I will be checking back with periodic updates along the way as events warrant.

This post is for information purposes only. There are risks involved with investing including loss of principal. Gerring Wealth Management (GWM) makes no explicit or implicit guarantee with respect to performance or the outcome of any investment or projections made by GWM. There is no guarantee that the goals of the strategies discussed by GWM will be met.

China’s Last Stand

Chinese stocks have struggled mightily over the past several weeks.  Although new fixed investment and fresh stimulus programs have historically accompanied the transition of political power in China, the government appears to be taking a different turn this time around.  This includes the tightening of credit in order to cool a long overheating housing market and measures to dampen inflationary pressures.  None of this is supportive of a rising stock market.  And with the global financial system now in knots over the unfolding situation in Cyprus, the risks to the downside are only increasing.

China stocks as measured by the iShares FTSE China 25 Index ETF (FXI) are now under heavy pressure.  But this was certainly not the case until recently, after bottoming at around $32 per share back in early September 2012, the FXI rallied strongly over the next few months, peaking at around $42 per share through late January 2013.  From there the tide turned lower, however. The first downshift was swiftly to $38 per share, where the FXI found strong support through late February into early March.  But starting last week, Chinese stocks broke decisively through this support and have been moving sharply lower in the days since.

Today, China stocks are making their last stand.  At $36.32 on the FXI as of late morning on Tuesday, it is perched right on long-term support at its 200-day moving average.  The bullish case might suggest a bounce may be imminent from these levels, particularly given that the FXI is now oversold based on relative strength and its momentum readings are now at bearish extremes.  But the 200-day moving average has not been a reliable source of support or resistance for China stocks over the last few years, and recent history from late 2011 has shown that the FXI can become much more deeply oversold before finally finding a bottom.  Furthermore, if the FXI does break decisively below what is already weak support at its 200-day moving average, an additional double-digit move to the downside to $32 per share would likely be in short order.

As a result, either now or following any short-term bounce in the coming days may be the time to close any remaining positions in FXI and move to the sidelines, particularly given the ongoing market uncertainty associated with the events unfolding in Cyprus and potentially across Europe.  And watching for any move to $32 per share on the FXI may warrant a fresh look at reestablishing positions.

Disclosure: I sold FXI on March 15 at just below $38 per share.

This post is for information purposes only. There are risks involved with investing including loss of principal. Gerring Wealth Management (GWM) makes no explicit or implicit guarantee with respect to performance or the outcome of any investment or projections made by GWM. There is no guarantee that the goals of the strategies discussed by GWM will be met.

Cyprus

The complacent calm that has overtaken financial markets thus far in 2013 will be put to a rigorous test in the coming days.  This is due to the news that came out of Cyprus over the weekend.  On Saturday, the tiny island nation and member of the European Monetary Union received a bailout in order to rescue their collapsing banking system.  It is not the fact that emergency action was required in an attempt to rescue yet another troubled European economy, however.  After all, such news has become almost commonplace in today’s post crisis world.  Instead, what is notable and potentially problematic for financial markets is the manner in which this latest bailout is being carried out.

So how can such a small place like Cyprus have any meaningful effect on the global economy?  After all, the United States will produce enough output in the next 12 hours to match the Cyprus GDP for the entire year.  It is because of the potential spillover effects resulting from how the bailout being imposed.

In short, Cyprus is receiving a 11 billion euro rescue package from the European Union (ESM) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).  But in order to receive these bailout funds, the Cypriot government must impose a 5.8 billion euro tax on bank deposits.  Otherwise, the Cypriot banking system will be left to collapse and the country would likely have to exit the euro currency.  As the deal stands as of late Sunday night, this includes a 9.9% tax on uninsured deposits over 100,000 euros and a 6.75% tax on INSURED deposits up to 100,000 euros.  It is precisely on this point where the Cyprus rescue plan has roiled the markets heading into the trading week.  For the tax is not being applied to shareholders or bondholders where the risk of loss is understood.  Instead, it is being levied on depositors.  And not just uninsured depositors, but also INSURED depositors.  On this point alone, we are now moving into dark and murky unchartered waters in this latest phase of the post crisis period.

When I teach the chapter on money and banking in my macroeconomics classes, I conduct a case study on what happened to the banking system during the financial crisis.  This includes a detailed examination of how bank balance sheets work.  The case study explores how the investment value for stockholders and bondholders in certain banks were either wiped out or heavily impaired as a result of the crisis.  But the one part of the bank balance sheet that is always considered essentially bulletproof in the study is insured customer deposits.  In short, if a customer deposits money with a bank, these funds will be made good to the customer no matter what and for good reason.  The following example to better illustrate what is happening this weekend in Cyprus shows why protecting insured deposits is so important.

As a purely hypothetical illustration, imagine you have a checking account at your local bank here in the United States.  Not a long-term investment account with stocks, bonds and commodities where it is understood that prices fluctuate on a daily basis.  Not even a money market mutual fund where some incremental risk of principal is assumed to achieve a slightly higher interest rate.  It is a checking account that you are using to manage your daily budget including paying your bills and accessing cash for immediate required expenditures.  Suppose you have $100,000 cash in your FDIC INSURED checking account, which means that even if the bank goes bankrupt tomorrow your money is fully guaranteed by the United States government.  Going into this weekend, you would have $100,000 in cash in your checking account that you would understandably assume is completely safe.  But under the Cypriot bailout scenario, you find out after the bank closed on Saturday that your account is only going to be worth $93,250 when it reopens on Monday because the U.S. government has suddenly and unexpectedly taken $6,750 from your checking account in order to carry out an emergency bank rescue plan.  Not only would you likely be upset and your confidence shaken, but you may also be inclined to rush to the bank to withdraw the remainder of your money as quickly as possible to protect against the potential for any future and unexpected levies.  Such are the origins of bank runs, and this is exactly what is happening right now in Cyprus.

This, of course, is not happening in the United States, and Cyprus is a very small place.  So why does all of this matter to global financial markets?  Because Cyprus is a member of the European Monetary Union.  And they are being induced to take these actions against insured depositors along with political reasons in order to continue using the euro currency.  But Cyprus is not the only country in the euro zone that is dire financial straits and potentially in need of rescue funds.  So too is Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy.  And for a person that is living in any one of these other at risk European economies that is watching what is happening in Cyprus this weekend, their natural instinct is to wonder whether their bank deposits may suddenly be next.  As a result, many depositors across Europe are likely evaluating whether they need to get to the bank in the coming days to withdraw their own money.  If we were to see bank run activity pick up momentum in any of these European countries in the coming days, it could have a meaningfully destabilizing effect.  And the one thing more than anything else that financial markets including stocks dislike, at least in normal market environments, is uncertainty.

The potential fallout effects from the unexpected situation in Cyprus highlights the continued importance diversification in today’s post crisis investment markets.  The stock market has steadily risen in 2013, but they have been alone in this advance as bonds have been flat to slightly lower and precious metals have fallen into correction.  Unfortunately for stocks, however, the rally thus far this year is being almost exclusively driven by the flow of liquidity from the latest QE monetary policy stimulus program from the U.S. Federal Reserve, as economic growth has otherwise ground to a halt and corporate earnings have fallen into decline in recent quarters.  In short, the recent stock rally is built on sand and is now overextended from a technical standpoint.  Thus, any sudden shocks have the potential to evaporate the year’s worth of stock gains in a matter of days.  Whether the events in Cyprus ends up being such a shock remains to be seen – stocks futures are down -20, or -1.3%, on the S&P 500 heading into overnight, but stocks have proven remarkably resilient to any bad news under the influence of QE, so a positive close on Monday would not at all be a surprise.  But high quality bonds and precious metals are already well overdue to regress to the mean relative to stocks, particularly at this stage of the latest QE program, and these categories would stand to benefit most under any correction scenario.  Thus, a rotation of liquidity out of stocks and into these more defensive safe haven categories is also a more than likely outcome even without the Cyprus situation.

I had already reduced portfolio stock allocations considerably ahead of the weekend before the outbreak of events in Cyprus.  This was due in part to the fact that the stock market had arrived this past week at major long-term resistance in the 1555 to 1580 range on the S&P 500 Index, for this is exactly where the stock market first peaked in March 2000 and topped out again in October 2007 only to go on and decline by more than -50% in both past instances.  Given the fact that the recent move higher in stocks is already overextended and long overdue for at least some sort of correction, stocks are at a minimum likely to pause and face serious headwinds at these levels.  And this expectation coupled with the recent news out of Cyprus is supportive of waiting on the sidelines in cash with the proceeds from these recent stock sales into new investments is a prudent strategy at least for the moment until some clarity is gained on how these events are likely to play out in the coming days.  The next few trading days should help explain a lot on how things are likely to play out in the weeks and months ahead.

This post is for information purposes only. There are risks involved with investing including loss of principal. Gerring Wealth Management (GWM) makes no explicit or implicit guarantee with respect to performance or the outcome of any investment or projections made by GWM. There is no guarantee that the goals of the strategies discussed by GWM will be met.

Where Have We Seen This Market Before?

The stock market rally since the beginning of the year is seemingly relentless.  Regardless of whether the market related news is good or bad, stocks seem to fight their way higher day after day.  This should not be mistaken as a signal for optimism about the U.S. economic outlook, however.  Instead, the recent rally is purely the byproduct of aggressive monetary stimulus from the U.S. Federal Reserve.  And recent history has shown that such rallies do not necessarily continue forever.

At the beginning of the year, the Fed added the purchase of U.S. Treasuries to its latest QE3 stimulus program.  It has been no coincidence that the market has subsequently rallied almost without interruption ever since, as the stimulus program effectively amounts to the Fed dropping off a $4.5 billion bag of cash on the doorsteps of U.S. banks each and every trading day.  Thus far, this cash has leaked its way into the stock market.  But such preferences can change at a moments notice.

A look back at the Fed’s previous balance sheet expanding monetary stimulus program highlights this point.  In late 2010, the Fed launched QE2, which also included the outright purchase of U.S. Treasuries.  And not long after the launch of QE2, stocks also entered into a seemingly relentless rally that lasted two and a half months.  What ended the rally back in mid February 2011?  The outbreak of the civil war in Libya is often cited as the reason, but a view across asset classes suggests it was simply a rotation out of stocks and into other asset classes.  In other words, market preferences changed, as stocks ground sideways for the remainder of QE2 while other categories such as precious metals including gold and silver as well as long-term Treasury bonds soared.

Today, stocks under QE3 are following a strikingly similar path experienced under QE2.  Looking ahead, if stocks today were to happen to continue this pattern going forward, it would imply the current rally on the S&P 500 Index would have another two weeks and +1.8% to the upside before hitting a comparable peak.  Exactly where on the S&P 500 would this peak occur?  At 1579, which just so happens to be effectively at the previous stock market peak first reached in March 2000 and revisited in October 2007.  Given the fact that the stock market has approached this level twice over the last 13 years and subsequently went on to decline by roughly half, this level represents major resistance.

None of this means that stocks will fail this time around.  After all, it’s often said that the third time’s the charm.  So perhaps stocks will simply blow through this resistance and breakout to new highs.  But given the widespread risks that continue to overhang the global economy and its financial markets, it is worthwhile to pay close attention to markets at these levels.  And exploring what other opportunities may be currently presenting themselves beyond the stock market would be at a minimum prudent.  It will be interesting to see how it all plays out.

This post is for information purposes only. There are risks involved with investing including loss of principal. Gerring Wealth Management (GWM) makes no explicit or implicit guarantee with respect to performance or the outcome of any investment or projections made by GWM. There is no guarantee that the goals of the strategies discussed by GWM will be met.

The Fed’s Balance Sheet Picks Up Pace

The expansion of the Fed’s balance sheet is picking up pace. 

Although it has been four months since the launch of QE3 back in mid-September, the increase in the Fed’s balance had been relatively sluggish.  For example, the Fed’s balance sheet had actually contracted over the first seven weeks of the program through the end of October.  And it had only expanded by $36 billion over the first three months of the program even though the Fed had stated its commitment to purchase mortgage-backed securities (MBS) at a rate of $40 billion per month.

Despite the sluggish start to QE3, asset purchases are now accelerating at an increasing rate.  Over the last five weeks, the Fed’s balance sheet has increased by another $69 billion.  And the expansion over the next several weeks is likely to pick up even further for two reasons.

First, the Fed’s MBS purchase program is continuing to pick up steam.  The reason QE3 was slow to get going over the first few months is that it can take up to several months for MBS purchases to settle.  But with each passing month, more and more of these purchases are reaching settlement and the cash is changing hands from the Fed to the banks.

Second, the Fed’s outright Treasury purchase program announced in mid-December as a supplement to its existing MBS purchase program got underway on January 3.  So going forward, markets will receive a daily injection of liquidity from Treasury purchases to go along with the massive bursts that occur two to three times a month from the MBS purchases.

Why is this important?  Because investment markets including stocks, high yield bonds, industrial commodities and precious metals have all shown the propensity to drift higher behind the fuel of liquidity injections from the Federal Reserve.  And Treasury purchases have proven to be particularly supportive to risk assets due to the daily liquidity flows.

So despite the fact that global economic growth remains sluggish and the upcoming earnings season promises to be lackluster at best, it would not be surprising to see stocks and other risk assets push to new post crisis highs for no other reason than an increasing sugar high thanks to the U.S. Federal Reserve.

This post is for information purposes only. There are risks involved with investing including loss of principal. Gerring Wealth Management (GWM) makes no explicit or implicit guarantee with respect to performance or the outcome of any investment or projections made by GWM. There is no guarantee that the goals of the strategies discussed by GWM will be met.

 

The QE-Treasury Paradox

It is a common belief among investors that quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve is supportive of the U.S. Treasury market including lower yields and higher prices.  On the surface, such a conclusion is certainly rational.  After all, if the Fed is spending billions of dollars buying U.S. Treasuries, this additional demand should support prices even further.  But history has repeatedly shown since the beginning of the financial crisis that the exact opposite is true.  U.S. Treasuries do not rally under QE.  Instead, they suffer mightily.

Nowhere is this phenomenon more pronounced than the long-term area of the U.S. Treasury market.  A look back over the last five years clearly demonstrates this point.  It was in March 2009 that the Fed expanded its still developing QE program at the time to include Treasury purchases.  Over the next year through March 2010, 30-Year U.S. Treasury yields ballooned by over 1.25 percentage points, peaking on the very last day of the program in March 2011.  When QE2 was revealed to the market later that year in August 2011, 30-Year U.S. Treasury yields once again jumped by 1.25 percentage points over the next several months.  And in recent months, we’ve seen 30-Year U.S. Treasury yields rise by 70 basis points once expectations for QE3 began to build in the summer of 2012 including 40 basis points since it was officially announced back in mid-September.

If U.S. Treasuries perform so poorly when the Fed is actively engaged in QE, what happens when the Fed steps away?  They perform tremendously well.  From the moment that QE1 ended, U.S. Treasuries rallied sharply with the 30-Year recovering all of its losses in the five months from April to August 2010.  And 30-Year yields dropped a whopping 1.50 percentage points in the first three months after the end of QE2 from July to September 2011.

So what is the explanation behind this paradox?  Why do Treasuries struggle when the Fed starts buying and rally when the Fed steps away?  The answer lies in the fact that all else is not being held equal when the Fed decides to act.  In short, whe the Fed begins purchasing Treasuries, it encourages increased risk taking with the net result that more money ends up rushing out of the Treasury market to pursue higher returns opportunities than enters in through the Fed’s purchase program.  On the flip side, when the Fed steps away from Treasury purchases, this discourages risk taking and with more investor money flocking to the safety of the Treasury market than is being lost by the Fed ending its program.

These forces are not limited exclusively to the Fed and QE, for if another major global central bank engages in asset purchases on a massive scale, the same effects can also apply.  Such was the case from December 2011 to February 2012 during the European Central Bank’s (ECB) Long-Term Refinancing Operation (LTRO).

The 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond iShares ETF (TLT) highlights this paradox even further.  Since the outbreak of the financial crisis, the time to purchase the TLT has been when the Fed is at the later stages if not the end of a QE stimulus program.  And the time to sell the TLT has been when the Fed is about to begin a new round of QE.  Thus, I exited all TLT positions back in September and it has come as no surprise to see the TLT break to the downside below its 200-day moving average in recent days, as this move has coincided almost to the day to the launch of the Fed’s outright Treasury purchases on January 3 as part of its current QE3 program.  For as we have seen under past rounds of QE, the TLT can remain locked in a downtrend below its 200-day moving average for most if not all of a QE program.

Looking ahead, continuing to monitor the TLT for any signs of a bottoming pattern for renewed consideration remains worthwhile, as it still represents one of the best ways to protect against crisis and effectively short the stock market.  But in the meantime, it remains best to step aside and reallocate elsewhere.

Disclosure: I have no positions in U.S. Treasuries or the TLT.

This post is for information purposes only. There are risks involved with investing including loss of principal. Gerring Wealth Management (GWM) makes no explicit or implicit guarantee with respect to performance or the outcome of any investment or projections made by GWM. There is no guarantee that the goals of the strategies discussed by GWM will be met.